<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for b.kocik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bkocik.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bkocik.net</link>
	<description>renaissance man</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Hi, no. (adventures in recruiting me) by Doug</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/08/25/hi-no-adventures-in-recruiting-me/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/?p=21#comment-66</guid>
		<description>This is one of those posts that (if it was possible) as you get to the end you are thinking about standing up and giving a standing ovation. 

I have had many of the same experiences. It is a talent market out there, tons and tons of job openings. You ask any company right now and they are looking for someone. Perhaps they should first start with their HR/Recruiting department. 

I have also been a recruiter and quickly realized it wasn't about the talent it was about the client paying for the services. Even though we said we cared about the talent first, they didn't pay the bills. Focus was on the number of resumes we could get in front of the client. Keeping in mind that 4 or 5 other recruiting companies were doing the same thing. It really is a mad dash to find the person for the slot, but this urgency doesn't take into consideration that this is a person you are dealing with, not a cog you are selling. They have a personality, goals, family, etc. 

Enough of my drivel, great post I hope they take notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those posts that (if it was possible) as you get to the end you are thinking about standing up and giving a standing ovation. </p>
<p>I have had many of the same experiences. It is a talent market out there, tons and tons of job openings. You ask any company right now and they are looking for someone. Perhaps they should first start with their HR/Recruiting department. </p>
<p>I have also been a recruiter and quickly realized it wasn&#8217;t about the talent it was about the client paying for the services. Even though we said we cared about the talent first, they didn&#8217;t pay the bills. Focus was on the number of resumes we could get in front of the client. Keeping in mind that 4 or 5 other recruiting companies were doing the same thing. It really is a mad dash to find the person for the slot, but this urgency doesn&#8217;t take into consideration that this is a person you are dealing with, not a cog you are selling. They have a personality, goals, family, etc. </p>
<p>Enough of my drivel, great post I hope they take notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monsters are real by valerie</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/06/24/monsters-are-real/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/?p=20#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the great post.  Sometimes I just get sick of explaining ourselves over and over again.  Now I can refer people here.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great post.  Sometimes I just get sick of explaining ourselves over and over again.  Now I can refer people here.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;abcdab&#8221; or, why I don&#8217;t work for Yahoo by bkocik</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/04/08/abcdab-or-why-i-dont-work-for-yahoo/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>bkocik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/2008/04/08/abcdab-or-why-i-dont-work-for-yahoo/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Google actually tried to recruit me once. I told them I wasn't interested. It's my perception (and it might be a wrong one) that their culture is a bit snobby and elitist and I just have no interest in being part of that, so I told them no very early on in the process. That was a couple of years ago. I didn't even know about their telecommuting policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google actually tried to recruit me once. I told them I wasn&#8217;t interested. It&#8217;s my perception (and it might be a wrong one) that their culture is a bit snobby and elitist and I just have no interest in being part of that, so I told them no very early on in the process. That was a couple of years ago. I didn&#8217;t even know about their telecommuting policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;abcdab&#8221; or, why I don&#8217;t work for Yahoo by Dossy Shiobara</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/04/08/abcdab-or-why-i-dont-work-for-yahoo/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Dossy Shiobara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/2008/04/08/abcdab-or-why-i-dont-work-for-yahoo/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I was considering applying for a position at GOOG late last year/earlier this year, but when I heard that they had a "firm no telecommuting policy" ("Really?  You know, this Internet thing ... it's going to be big someday ..." -- really wanted to use that line on the recruiter ...) I basically stopped wasting my time.  I didn't even get to the part where I try to talk them up to a reasonable salary level.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was considering applying for a position at GOOG late last year/earlier this year, but when I heard that they had a &#8220;firm no telecommuting policy&#8221; (&#8221;Really?  You know, this Internet thing &#8230; it&#8217;s going to be big someday &#8230;&#8221; &#8212; really wanted to use that line on the recruiter &#8230;) I basically stopped wasting my time.  I didn&#8217;t even get to the part where I try to talk them up to a reasonable salary level.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monsters are real by BUBB4H</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/06/24/monsters-are-real/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>BUBB4H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/?p=20#comment-59</guid>
		<description>This was an excellent post.  I cringe when I see the "cower while they come save me" mentality of so many in this home of the "brave".  But make no mistake, safety and security does not end with getting a gun.  A gun is not a magic talisman that will ward off all evil.  It WILL deter many, less motivated criminals looking for easy prey.  But unless you know how to handle it, manipulate it and effectively employ it, it is just another tool.  It's not for everyone, and there are plenty of other security measures and self defense mechanisms that are available besides firearms.  Just as we are told to be tolerant of other religions, race, etc. we need to be tolerant of others' rights to protect themselves in the manner in which they choose is best for their families; whether it be a Mossberg 12ga. manstopper or a bull mastiff named Cujo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an excellent post.  I cringe when I see the &#8220;cower while they come save me&#8221; mentality of so many in this home of the &#8220;brave&#8221;.  But make no mistake, safety and security does not end with getting a gun.  A gun is not a magic talisman that will ward off all evil.  It WILL deter many, less motivated criminals looking for easy prey.  But unless you know how to handle it, manipulate it and effectively employ it, it is just another tool.  It&#8217;s not for everyone, and there are plenty of other security measures and self defense mechanisms that are available besides firearms.  Just as we are told to be tolerant of other religions, race, etc. we need to be tolerant of others&#8217; rights to protect themselves in the manner in which they choose is best for their families; whether it be a Mossberg 12ga. manstopper or a bull mastiff named Cujo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monsters are real by Bundabar</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/06/24/monsters-are-real/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Bundabar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/?p=20#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I keep my guns loaded and in a safe, that way children or anyone else besides my wife and I do not have access to my guns.  In the event I need one I punch in the code and within 2 seconds I have a loaded gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep my guns loaded and in a safe, that way children or anyone else besides my wife and I do not have access to my guns.  In the event I need one I punch in the code and within 2 seconds I have a loaded gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monsters are real by bkocik</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/06/24/monsters-are-real/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>bkocik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/?p=20#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Come on, Joe - do you really think that because you were able to Google and find research that falls on the side of the fence opposite from mine, I somehow have not done my job? Do you think there is any stance one can take - even backed by data - that someone else cannot rebut with other data?

With regards to your point about suicide, it took me less than 10 minutes to refute it. Data from the FBI Uniform Crime Statistics online and ATF Firearms Commerce Report for 2002 indicate that there is no link between firearm ownership and suicide rates. I know you can do better than that.

As to your question regarding safe firearm storage - most of the time the gun is in my direct possession. When it's not, it's safely out of reach (and unloaded and locked). Just like the pesticides.

Trying to keep a firearm both safe from unauthorized access *and* ready to use at all times is a tall order. One has to compromise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Joe - do you really think that because you were able to Google and find research that falls on the side of the fence opposite from mine, I somehow have not done my job? Do you think there is any stance one can take - even backed by data - that someone else cannot rebut with other data?</p>
<p>With regards to your point about suicide, it took me less than 10 minutes to refute it. Data from the FBI Uniform Crime Statistics online and ATF Firearms Commerce Report for 2002 indicate that there is no link between firearm ownership and suicide rates. I know you can do better than that.</p>
<p>As to your question regarding safe firearm storage - most of the time the gun is in my direct possession. When it&#8217;s not, it&#8217;s safely out of reach (and unloaded and locked). Just like the pesticides.</p>
<p>Trying to keep a firearm both safe from unauthorized access *and* ready to use at all times is a tall order. One has to compromise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monsters are real by Dr Dzoe</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/06/24/monsters-are-real/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Dzoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/?p=20#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Come on, Bill.  I was able to find the research to refute much of what you wrote with all of ten minutes of Googling.  You can do better than that.

For what it is worth, I recommend looking around at the links and references provided in the following: http://www.bradycampaign.org, www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/prevviol.pdf, www.ena.org/ipinstitute/fact/enaipfactsheet-gunsafety.pdf.

Look at just one aspect of all of this: having a gun in the home increases the chance that someone living in the home will commit suicide by a factor of 5.  (The reference to that is cited in the third PDF above.)  And the suicide rate in this country is considerably higher than the homicide rate - meaning that it's a higher risk.  So even if having a gun decreases your chance of death-by-intruder by a factor of five (and I find that far-fetched - certainly the statistics you site above are far less generous then that), having a gun increases your chance of violent death.

(I suspect that facts like that are behind the fact that a gun in your home is more likely going to be used by someone living in your home than on an intruder.)

Note that I haven't seen statistics that give the real answer to any of this: what is the comparative death rate for violence (from others and self-inflicted) between homes with guns and without.  That's the statistic that is really needed - and nothing that I've presented above, and nothing that you put in the blog post, answers that question.

Also none of this is to say that I support gun control laws.  If you want a gun in your home, that's fine by me.  But bear in mind that you are increasing some types of risks for you and your family by having that gun.  Pretending otherwise does not make it any less so.

Because while there are monsters out there, there are also monsters within us.  And one of those monsters goes by the name of suicidal depression.

(One question - something that I'm really curious about: how do you store a gun safely in such a way that a child cannot get at it, but that it is quickly and easily accessible in an emergency?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Bill.  I was able to find the research to refute much of what you wrote with all of ten minutes of Googling.  You can do better than that.</p>
<p>For what it is worth, I recommend looking around at the links and references provided in the following: <a href="http://www.bradycampaign.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.bradycampaign.org</a>, <a href="http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/prevviol.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/prevviol.pdf</a>, <a href="http://www.ena.org/ipinstitute/fact/enaipfactsheet-gunsafety.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ena.org/ipinstitute/fact/enaipfactsheet-gunsafety.pdf</a>.</p>
<p>Look at just one aspect of all of this: having a gun in the home increases the chance that someone living in the home will commit suicide by a factor of 5.  (The reference to that is cited in the third PDF above.)  And the suicide rate in this country is considerably higher than the homicide rate - meaning that it&#8217;s a higher risk.  So even if having a gun decreases your chance of death-by-intruder by a factor of five (and I find that far-fetched - certainly the statistics you site above are far less generous then that), having a gun increases your chance of violent death.</p>
<p>(I suspect that facts like that are behind the fact that a gun in your home is more likely going to be used by someone living in your home than on an intruder.)</p>
<p>Note that I haven&#8217;t seen statistics that give the real answer to any of this: what is the comparative death rate for violence (from others and self-inflicted) between homes with guns and without.  That&#8217;s the statistic that is really needed - and nothing that I&#8217;ve presented above, and nothing that you put in the blog post, answers that question.</p>
<p>Also none of this is to say that I support gun control laws.  If you want a gun in your home, that&#8217;s fine by me.  But bear in mind that you are increasing some types of risks for you and your family by having that gun.  Pretending otherwise does not make it any less so.</p>
<p>Because while there are monsters out there, there are also monsters within us.  And one of those monsters goes by the name of suicidal depression.</p>
<p>(One question - something that I&#8217;m really curious about: how do you store a gun safely in such a way that a child cannot get at it, but that it is quickly and easily accessible in an emergency?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monsters are real by bkocik</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/06/24/monsters-are-real/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>bkocik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/?p=20#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Thanks, David - references added.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, David - references added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monsters are real by David</title>
		<link>http://bkocik.net/2008/06/24/monsters-are-real/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkocik.net/?p=20#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Very well written. As a gun owner w/ a CCP [1] I only wish I would have written this. The only thing I regret about what you wrote is that while you cite statistics I know to be true (because I've also done the research), you don't reference them. If you have the links, please update so that someone reading this can see for themselves the truth behind it, and not just think its "some other gun nut trying to defend his reason for gun ownership". Sure there are those that will doubt it anyway, but those of reasonable intelligence will see through the lies.

[1] Well, I still have one, but its expired. I don't carry currently, and I've been to lazy to go through the process of a re-issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well written. As a gun owner w/ a CCP [1] I only wish I would have written this. The only thing I regret about what you wrote is that while you cite statistics I know to be true (because I&#8217;ve also done the research), you don&#8217;t reference them. If you have the links, please update so that someone reading this can see for themselves the truth behind it, and not just think its &#8220;some other gun nut trying to defend his reason for gun ownership&#8221;. Sure there are those that will doubt it anyway, but those of reasonable intelligence will see through the lies.</p>
<p>[1] Well, I still have one, but its expired. I don&#8217;t carry currently, and I&#8217;ve been to lazy to go through the process of a re-issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
